For millennia thought experiments have contemplated hypothetical situations - from Plato’s cave to Schrodinger’s cat. Thought experiments are situations that can’t be recreated in the real world –because they’re too costly or too cruel. Plato couldn’t chain unwitting subjects in a cave. And imagine the uproar if Schrodinger had killed all those cats. This blog explores a series of climate change thought experiments and asks what if? What if we could change whatever we want to see what happens?

Showing posts with label aviation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label aviation. Show all posts

Wednesday, 10 October 2012

What if... all flights were grounded?


I thought I'd make my first post about the event that inspired this blog. In April 2010 the Eyjafjallajökull Volcano in Iceland erupted, spewing millions of tonnes of ash into the air. The ensuing ash cloud which engulfed northern Europe forced twenty countries to close their airspace, grounding hundreds of thousands of flights.

What was bad news for tourists was a once in a lifetime opportunity for scientists. Previously they could only postulate the effects of such a large scale change to aviation – now they could observe it firsthand.  David McCandless produced this marvelous diagram for his information is beautiful website  to illustrate the carbon dioxide offset by all those grounded flights. He references his sources here.



Let's take the idea one step further. Instead of European flights, what would be the impact of grounding all the flights in the world? (on a side note, the video below- an animation of all the flights in the world - makes fascinating viewing).


Each year, 165 member countries report their greenhouse gas emissions the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The World Resources Institute (WRI), a global environmental think tank, compile this data to produce a comprehensive database of global emissions. According to the WRI, 1.6% of global greenhouse gas emissions are from aviation. So the impact of not flying would be relatively small right?

Not quite. Aviation emissions have a threefold effect. Firstly, there's the direct emissions. Next, the high concentrations of nitrous oxides emitted by planes induce the formation of ozone, another greenhouse gas, which causes further warming. Finally, aircraft contrails - water vapour tracks drawn in their wake - are thought to induce clouds which further enhance warming. Once these two additional effects are taken into account, the IPCC estimates aviation accounts for 3.5% of total global emissions.

It's still only 3.5% - so why all the fuss about aviation?

It's because of the rate at which aviation emissions are increasing. The aviation industry has grown 9% year on year since 1960. So stop aviation now and you'll be stubbing out a major future emissions source.