The ongoing debate over wind power intensified last week
when Tory minister John Hayes claimed 'Enough is enough!'. Wind farms are causing
an irreversible blight on our green and pleasant land and new developments must
be stopped.
Whatever your thoughts on wind turbines (personally I think
they're beautiful, certainly less of an eyesore than the pylons that stretch
across the countryside) there's no denying that there's more of them about
these days. The world produces 13 times more energy
from wind now than it did at the turn of the century. But I was surprised
to find that, despite the Sustainable Energy commission stating the UK has the 'best
wind resources in Europe', it produces relatively little wind power compared
to its European counterparts. Take Germany for instance. According
to the IEA, Germany produces 6% of its electricity from wind and the UK,
just under 3%. So we can't be that hard done by.
But just how bad could things get? What if the entire world
switched to wind power?
If you're looking for energy stats, there aren't many better
sources that David Mackay's brilliant Sustainability
without the hot air. Mackay looks at the numbers to bring a much needed level
headedness to the energy debate. In the video below he outlines the huge scale
of the energy challenge more concisely than I could ever hope to.
Mackay calculates
that covering 10% of the UK in wind turbines (An area bigger than Wales) would produce
20kwh a day per person of energy - half the energy used to drive a 50km daily commute. Of course, stronger winds mean there's greater potential for
generating energy out at sea. Mackay calculates
that, if the shallow waters around the entire UK coastline were covered in a
strip of turbines 4km thick (total area 13,000km2) we'd get an
additional 16 kwh a day per person. Currently we're limited to these shallow
waters - wind turbines in deeper waters
are just not economically viable.
So if we covered Wales in wind turbines and fully exploited
our coastal waters, wind power could produce 36kwh a day per person - a long
way short of the 195kwh
a day we currently use.
Norwegian company Statoil have developed floating wind turbines that could be used in deep waters |
The average person on Earth uses much less energy than us -
about 56kwh a day per
person. So how big an area would we need to provide this energy with wind
turbines alone? Well if we assume global wind speeds are similar to those
Mackay has used for his UK calculations (a gross simplification I know) and
there are 7 billion people on the planet - a quick calculation reveals you'd
need to cover 6.85 million km2 of land in wind turbines - about
twice the size of India!
When it's put like this, the need for an energy mix is
obvious. It's impossible to rely solely on one energy source such as wind - the
engineering challenge would be unimaginably big. And that's before we've even
considered that it's not windy all the time. So if we want to make sure we can
produce electricity 24/7, we a range of energy sources.
On a similar note, it would take 52,000 wind turbines (per year) just to keep pace with how much coal-based electricity India and China are adding to their grids each year (conservative estimate). Source: Dieter Helm, 'The Carbon Crunch'
ReplyDelete