You might have spotted stories in the press
lately stating that electric vehicles are worse for the environment than
conventional ones. This isn’t what we've been led to believe. So is it true?
And if so, what would happen if we all switched to electric cars tomorrow?
The reports stemmed from a study by the Norwegian University of Science and
Technology that looked at the lifecycle impacts of electric cars against
conventional ones. Lifecycle analyses look at stages in a cars life, from
manufacture to disposal, and calculates the environmental impact in each. Impact
includes both greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and environmental contamination
from toxic materials released into the environment.
Globally 13% of GHG emissions are from transport of which 6%
are from road vehicles
Source: IPCC 2007 Assessment report
|
This is a blog about climate change so I don’t want to dwell
on environmental contamination issues which, whilst I would never suggest are
unimportant, are a separate issue to the greenhouse gas emissions that warm the
globe. In short, electric vehicles were found to cause much more contamination
of freshwater and ecosystems due to the higher concentrations of copper and
aluminum involved in their manufacture... Bad news.
But what about climate change? The report found that the
global warming impact of manufacturing electric vehicles was roughly twice that
calculated in previous
reports. But by far the biggest
source of greenhouse gas emissions in an electric car's lifetime come from
driving it (the usage phase).
This is counter-intuitive. Electric cars, which have no
exhaust, should perform much better here. But if the electricity used to power
the cars comes from fossil fuels, then each unit of electricity used driving
will have associated GHG emissions.
Electric car manufacturers Tesla claim their Roadster model
has zero emissions. But does it really?
|
In Europe, where use
of renewables is comparatively high, electric cars have a 10% - 24% lower
global warming impact than conventional cars over the average lifetime distance
of 150,000km. Use the car for longer and the reduction increases. The opposite
is true for shorter distances.
But if all the electricity to power the car comes from coal,
the situation changes. Suddenly electric cars have a 17% - 27% bigger global
warming impact. In a world
where 64% of electricity is produced from fossil fuels (compared with 50%
in Europe), if we all switched to electric cars tomorrow, the impact on GHG
emissions would be much smaller than one might expect.
So if you live in China, I wouldn't run out and buy an
electric car. But you might consider it if you're from the EU. And as the
global energy mix becomes more reliant on renewables in the future, investing
in an electric car will become increasingly sensible. The Smith School, a
University of Oxford research centre founded by ex-chief government scientist
David King recently published a future
transport roadmap stating that electric vehicles should play a vital role
in reducing future GHG emissions from transport. And the UK government's chief climate
change advisory group, the Committee on Climate Change, state
that it will be impossible to meet emissions targets from road vehicles without
using electric cars.
Might be time to start browsing those showrooms.
Very interesting reading. What about automobiles working on solar power? Please enlighten.
ReplyDeleteHi Sonal - thanks for your comment
DeleteI'm no expert but a quick google search says that at the moment, solar cars just aren't powerful enough. The amount of energy a solar powered car can harness is limited by its surface area. So unless the car is HUGE, you can't get enough energy to move more than one person at a time.
But I've linked to a paper I found below which suggests a combination of hybrid (like the Toyota Prius) and solar vehicles might be a good way to go...
http://vpa2.sabanciuniv.edu/icatconf/icat2000-2006/tr/data/a3-1-Gianfranco%20Rizzo_ICAT_2006_UniSaCt.pdf