For millennia thought experiments have contemplated hypothetical situations - from Plato’s cave to Schrodinger’s cat. Thought experiments are situations that can’t be recreated in the real world –because they’re too costly or too cruel. Plato couldn’t chain unwitting subjects in a cave. And imagine the uproar if Schrodinger had killed all those cats. This blog explores a series of climate change thought experiments and asks what if? What if we could change whatever we want to see what happens?

Wednesday 17 October 2012

What if... we all drove electric?


You might have spotted stories in the press lately stating that electric vehicles are worse for the environment than conventional ones. This isn’t what we've been led to believe. So is it true? And if so, what would happen if we all switched to electric cars tomorrow?

The reports stemmed from a study by the Norwegian University of Science and Technology that looked at the lifecycle impacts of electric cars against conventional ones. Lifecycle analyses look at stages in a cars life, from manufacture to disposal, and calculates the environmental impact in each. Impact includes both greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and environmental contamination from toxic materials released into the environment.
Globally 13% of GHG emissions are from transport of which 6% are from road vehicles
Source: IPCC 2007 Assessment report

This is a blog about climate change so I don’t want to dwell on environmental contamination issues which, whilst I would never suggest are unimportant, are a separate issue to the greenhouse gas emissions that warm the globe. In short, electric vehicles were found to cause much more contamination of freshwater and ecosystems due to the higher concentrations of copper and aluminum involved in their manufacture... Bad news.

But what about climate change? The report found that the global warming impact of manufacturing electric vehicles was roughly twice that calculated in previous reports.  But by far the biggest source of greenhouse gas emissions in an electric car's lifetime come from driving it (the usage phase).

This is counter-intuitive. Electric cars, which have no exhaust, should perform much better here. But if the electricity used to power the cars comes from fossil fuels, then each unit of electricity used driving will have associated GHG emissions.
Electric car manufacturers Tesla claim their Roadster model has zero emissions. But does it really?

In Europe, where use of renewables is comparatively high, electric cars have a 10% - 24% lower global warming impact than conventional cars over the average lifetime distance of 150,000km. Use the car for longer and the reduction increases. The opposite is true for shorter distances.

But if all the electricity to power the car comes from coal, the situation changes. Suddenly electric cars have a 17% - 27% bigger global warming impact. In a world where 64% of electricity is produced from fossil fuels (compared with 50% in Europe), if we all switched to electric cars tomorrow, the impact on GHG emissions would be much smaller than one might expect.

So if you live in China, I wouldn't run out and buy an electric car. But you might consider it if you're from the EU. And as the global energy mix becomes more reliant on renewables in the future, investing in an electric car will become increasingly sensible. The Smith School, a University of Oxford research centre founded by ex-chief government scientist David King recently published a future transport roadmap stating that electric vehicles should play a vital role in reducing future GHG emissions from transport. And the UK government's chief climate change advisory group, the Committee on Climate Change, state that it will be impossible to meet emissions targets from road vehicles without using electric cars.

Might be time to start browsing those showrooms.

2 comments:

  1. Very interesting reading. What about automobiles working on solar power? Please enlighten.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Sonal - thanks for your comment

      I'm no expert but a quick google search says that at the moment, solar cars just aren't powerful enough. The amount of energy a solar powered car can harness is limited by its surface area. So unless the car is HUGE, you can't get enough energy to move more than one person at a time.

      But I've linked to a paper I found below which suggests a combination of hybrid (like the Toyota Prius) and solar vehicles might be a good way to go...

      http://vpa2.sabanciuniv.edu/icatconf/icat2000-2006/tr/data/a3-1-Gianfranco%20Rizzo_ICAT_2006_UniSaCt.pdf

      Delete